Αναγνώστες

Αναζήτηση

30/8/14

Britain facing 'greatest terrorist threat' in history

9:41PM BST 29 Aug 2014
The Telegraph






Britain faces the “greatest and deepest” terror threat in the country’s history, David Cameron warned as he pledged emergency measures to tackle extremists.
The UK threat level was raised to “severe” — its second highest — meaning that a terrorist attack is “highly likely” in light of the growing danger from British jihadists returning from Iraq and Syria.
The Prime Minister said that the risk posed by Isil (the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) will last for “decades” and raised the prospect of an expanding terrorist nation “on the shores of the Mediterranean”.
He disclosed that Isil had made “specific” threats against the UK and did not rule out military action to tackle the growing problem.
More than 500 Britons are believed to have gone to Iraq and Syria and at least half have returned, with some feared to be planning attacks here. One major plot has been foiled.
The warning came as it emerged that a laptop seized from Isil in Syria contained research on how to make a biological bomb and religious justification to use it against civilians.
On Monday, Mr Cameron will unveil a number of “uncompromising” measures to help tackle British jihadists and fill the “gaps in our armoury”.
They will include stopping British fanatics from travelling to or returning from the war zones by making it easier to seize their passports.
He is also expected to tighten controls that can be put on the movement and activities of terror suspects within the UK.
It is the first time in three years that the threat level has stood at severe, just one short of “critical”, which would mean an attack is imminent.
The raised alert will lead to an increase in the number of armed police on the streets, especially around landmark sites and airports.
Theresa May, the Home Secretary, insisted that the move was not a result of any specific plot, but in light of the increasing dangers posed by British fanatics and other foreign fighters in Iraq and Syria.
The change also comes less than a week before a Nato summit in south Wales, which will be the biggest gathering of heads of state in the UK.
The White House said that it had consulted with the British Government about the heightened threat level, but there was no plan to raise America’s equivalent threat notice.
In a Downing Street press conference, Mr Cameron said: “What we’re facing in Iraq now with Isil is a greater and deeper threat to our security than we have known before.
“In Afghanistan the Taliban were prepared to play host to al-Qaeda. With Isil we are facing a terrorist organisation not being hosted in the country but seeking to establish and then violently expand its own terrorist state.
“We could be facing a terrorist state on the shores of the Mediterranean bordering a Nato State.
“We are in the middle of a generational struggle against a poisonous and extremist ideology that I believe we will be fighting for years if not decades.”
Mr Cameron said that the world had been “shocked and sickened” by the Isil murder of James Foley, the US journalist, apparently by a British terrorist.
He said that he was “absolutely satisfied that Isil has specific threats and will make specific threats to the UK”.
Whitehall sources said Isil and other terrorist groups in Iraq and Syria are planning attacks against the UK and other Western countries.
The Prime Minister said: “It was clear evidence that this is not some foreign conflict thousands of miles from home that we can hope to ignore. The ambition to create an extremist caliphate in the heart of Iraq and Syria is a threat to our own security here in the UK.”
He said that the battle was between Islam and extremists who used a “poisonous ideology” and “the most brutal forms of terrorism to force people to accept a warped world view”.
Mr Cameron has been under pressure to join the US in air strikes against the terror group. Downing Street has insisted that no request has been made, but the Prime Minister yesterday would not rule out military action.
“We must use all the resources we have at our disposal,” he said. “Learning the lessons from the past doesn’t mean that there isn’t a place for our military.
“The military were vital in driving al-Qaeda from Afghanistan and we support the US air strikes against Isil in Iraq. Military force is just one element of what we can do.”
There have also been calls for changes in the law to help strip passports from British jihadists.
The Prime Minister promised there would be no knee-jerk reaction, but added: “It is becoming clear that there are some gaps in our armoury and we need to strengthen them. We need to do more to stop people travelling, to stop those who do go from returning and to deal decisively with those who are already here.”
He went on: “Adhering to British values is not an option or choice. It is a duty to those who live on this island. In the end it is only by standing up that we will defeat extremism.”
Earlier this week Scotland Yard warned that the arrest rate for those suspected of being involved in Syria or Iraq-related terrorism had increased five-fold since last year.
The decision to raise the threat level was taken by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, which operates out of MI5 and is independent of ministers.
Mrs May said: “We face a real and serious threat in the UK from international terrorism. I would urge the public to remain vigilant and to report any suspicious activity to the police.”


28/8/14

Countdown to Israel’s Destruction



Times of Israel. 28.8.14 

The round of fighting with Hamas is one more stage in Israel’s strategic downward spiral. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared victory. At the same time, Gaza’s Hamas rulers are dancing in the street. Ahmed Barakat, senior member of Hezbollah, has stated that the “countdown to the disappearance of the Zionist entity [Israel] in the region has begun.” Unfortunately, Netanyahu is wrong and Barakat is right.
If you count bodies and destroyed homes, Israel won the round. But if you look at the overall strategic situation, what you see is a steady deterioration in Israel’s position, both militarily and diplomatically. After the last Intifada, Israel’s enemies realized that suicide bombing alone cannot achieve their desired goal – the destruction of the Jewish state. So what they embarked on is a three-pronged strategy that involves low-level conflict and terror, combined with the development and production of weapons of mass destruction and an unrelenting media war designed to isolate Israel and create the international atmosphere necessary for its elimination. They have succeeded on all three fronts.
With respect to low-level conflict and terror, recently, in one week alone, Israel was fired on from Gaza by Hamas, from Lebanon by Hezbollah and from Syria by a combination of rebel and Syrian army forces. Kuneitra in Syria, right on the border with Israel, has fallen to Al-Qaida-affiliated forces. If not for the Egyptian army taking over Cairo, Israel would also be facing Al-Qaida in the Sinai and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The noose is tightening.
Economically, a few relatively low-cost tunnels on the Gaza border and a few thousand cheap rockets and mortars have cost Israel billions of dollars and, for a couple of days, even shut down Ben-Gurion airport. Israel’s isolation was near total.
All this is possible because Israel is fighting with two hands tied behind its back. Its political and military leaders are so close to the trees, they can’t see the forest. They have not caught on to the idea that power is useless if you can’t wield it. Specifically, the forces lined up against Israel have spent billions of dollars in an unrelenting media war to delegitimize and isolate the Jewish state. They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. Today, Israel is a de-facto pariah state in the world.
Even during the worst days of South Africa’s Apartheid, no one called for the destruction of South Africa. What they were calling for is a regime change, not the annihilation of the state. With Israel, it’s different. In campuses around the world “progressive” students and faculty are openly calling for the elimination of the Jewish state. Israel’s defenders are reduced to a campaign of whining: “why do you criticize Israel and not genocidal regimes such as Sudan and Syria?” In other words, at this moment the best that Israel’s friends can do is put it in the company of mass murderers.
In the international media, Israel is portrayed as the enemy of peace, the disruptor of international stability and a racist, colonialist regime that targets Arab children for a pastime. The worst Nazi-type anti-Semitic stereotypes have been taken out of mothballs, dusted off and applied to the Jewish state by seemingly respectable people. Around the world, left-wing and right-wing demonstrators stand shoulder to shoulder calling for “death to Israel”.
In the suburbs of Paris, Jews have to fight street battles to prevent a synagogue from being burnt down with its congregation inside. In South Africa, a politician calls for the gunning down of South-African Jewish leadership in “retaliation” for the war in Gaza. In England, kosher products are taken off supermarket shelves, so as not to incite the local population.
And what is Israel doing about the media war that has made all this possible? Absolutely nothing. While billions of dollars are fuelling the anti-Israel campaign, Israel is spending zero. Israel’s leadership is fighting early Twentieth-century battles. They are spending billions on tanks and nothing on media. Its enemies are spending billions on media and almost nothing on tanks. Israel is fighting last century’s war. Its enemies are fighting the war of tomorrow, often with the low-tech, media-friendly tools of yesterday. This “Neo-Primitivism” involves decapitation on youtube and other such methods. Put differently, Israel may be at the cutting edge of High Technology, but its enemies are on the cutting edge of post-modern warfare.
Israel’s leadership still has the quaint idea that the media war is really a matter of “Hasbarah”. There are even “Hasbarah experts” in the employ of the government, and of the World Zionist Organization. “Hasbarah” is Hebrew for “explanation”. Israel’s leaders believe that the way to fight a media war is to fund a couple of civil servants whose task it is to “explain” to the world why Israel is right and its enemies are wrong. This is like fighting F-16s with slingshots. More seriously, it reveals the total bankruptcy of Israel’s strategic thinking. Basically, Israel’s leaders haven’t figured out that what is depicted on CNN and BBC is more important than what happens on the streets of Gaza. If you win the latter and lose the former, you are the big loser. You can have Hellfire missiles, but you won’t be able to use them. And if you do use them, America’s president will not replenish them – because he watches CNN, or at least his constituents do. Put simply, you cannot win a war on the ground if you don’t fight the war of the airwaves. The latter has nothing to do with “Hasbarah” and everything to do with strategic power.
But that’s not all. The fact is that the media war, even if Israel engages in it, will not be fought on a level playing field. Israeli ideology and culture creates a blind spot in its leaders’ worldview. They simply don’t have the tools to understand anti-Semitism. It’s out there, and it’s real and they can’t see it. No country surrounded by Hezbollah, Al-Qaida, Hamas and ISIS would have to engage in a media war to “explain” to the world that it lives in a tough neighborhood, except Israel. Cool progressives would not allow themselves to call for the destruction of any state on the face of the planet, except for Israel. The fact is that the present media war conducted against Israel by its enemies is aimed at a planet that is – by and large – receptive to the message. Less than 70 years after a million Jewish children were incinerated in the heart of Europe, the idea of Jewish fighters defending their children is still anathema to millions of people.
As for Israel’s “friends”, the news is not good. Most of the planet is against the Jewish state and, while ancient Jewish communities have become extinct from Yemen to Afghanistan, from Greece to Poland, anti-Israel Muslim populations have expanded exponentially. This combination of sociological factors guarantees that in the near future most states in the international community will work harder and harder to isolate the state of Israel like no state has been isolated before. Countries like Canada are an exception, but in reality Canada’s support turns on one man’s continued leadership, Stephen Harper. When he goes, so will Canada’s support. As for the United States, the so-called “Jewish lobby”, namely America’s Jewish population, is disintegrating before our eyes. America’s Jews are assimilating and intermarrying. Even if they identify as Jews, for most of them Israel is not a priority. In fact, many go out of their way to prove that they are Americans first by beating up on the Jewish state. One of the few reasons for America’s continued support – such as it is – is not the power of the Jewish constituency, but of the Evangelical Christian community. This, too, shall pass. The anti-Israel forces in the American Evangelical community – old-school Jimmy Carter types – are gaining strength. Many will desert Israel. Already, there are those who claim that the “real Jews” of the bible are the Palestinians and the Israelis are the “Romans who crucified our lord”.
If you think United States President Obama is lukewarm towards Israel, the day will come – and it’s not far – that Obama will look like a right-wing Zionist compared to the people who will sit in the White House. A new president shall come, who grew up on CNN and was educated on virulently anti-Israel campuses. He will not just hold back missiles, he will arm Israel’s enemies.
This is not science fiction. This is science. If the world sees you as a genocidal state, its leaders will seek your destruction. What’s “fiction” is the world that Israel’s leaders live in. Netanyahu’s world – where anti-Semitism is not a factor, where America has Israel’s back and where Hamas is really a loser despite the mass celebrations on Gaza’s streets – is a figment of his imagination.
Netanyahu and some of his Cabinet ministers – Naphtali Bennett is a good example – believe that going on CNN and sparring with Christiane Amanpour is what good media is all about. They don’t understand that these appearances – and the “high-fives” they get from their entourage – are useless. They can’t fight a war in Gaza by parachuting a couple of cabinet ministers into the fray. Neither can they fight a media war by showing off their command of English on CNN. Put simply, if it doesn’t start fighting this war, Israel will become more vulnerable than ever before. And this will happen in the next few months – just as Iran becomes a nuclear power.
So here’s my message to Israel’s leaders and supporters: it’s not too late. Start fighting the media war or we will go down in defeat – soon.


Read more: Countdown to Israel’s Destruction | Simcha Jacobovici | The Blogs | The Times of Israel http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/countdown-to-israels-destruction/#ixzz3BjRL68hs 

2/8/14

Belgistan? Sharia Showdown Looms in Brussels


Woman Used As Human Shield in ‘70s Exposes Hamas Propaganda


Helsingin Sanomat correspondant admits hamas launched rockets from shifa hospital


1/8/14

Israeli PM Netanyahu on CNN - FULL INTERVIEW 7/27/2014


Η προπαγάνδα να μην αλλοιώσει την αλήθεια

ΒΙΚΤΩΡΑ ΙΣΑΑΚ ΕΛΙΕΖΕΡ
ΚΑΘΗΜΕΡΙΝΗ 31.07.2014

Η ​​αλήθεια είναι ότι ο αραβικός κόσμος δεν δέχθηκε ποτέ τη δημιουργία του εβραϊκού κράτους στην ιστορική γη του εβραϊκού λαού. Δεν ήταν το Ισραήλ που απέρριψε την απόφαση του ΟΗΕ το 1947, η οποία προέβλεπε την ίδρυση δύο κρατών ανάμεσα στον Ιορδάνη ποταμό και στη Μεσόγειο Θάλασσα. Τα στρατεύματα έξι αραβικών κρατών επιτέθηκαν εναντίον του υπό σύσταση κράτους του Ισραήλ προκειμένου να το εξαφανίσουν από τον χάρτη. Το 1967, η Συρία, η Ιορδανία και η Αίγυπτος απώλεσαν εδάφη μετά τον πόλεμο των Εξι Ημερών που οι ίδιες κήρυξαν εναντίον του Ισραήλ, με τη βεβαιότητα του παναραβικού ηγέτη Αμπντέλ Νάσερ ότι θα απωθούσε τους Εβραίους στη θάλασσα. Η Δυτική Οχθη του Ιορδάνη, η Χερσόνησος του Σινά και η Λωρίδα της Γάζας καταλήφθηκαν από το Ισραήλ.

Οταν όμως το 1978 υπογράφηκε η συμφωνία ειρήνης με την Αίγυπτο, το Ισραήλ αποχώρησε από τη Χερσόνησο του Σινά, απέσυρε οικισμούς και εποίκους και επέστρεψε στα προ του 1967 σύνορα. Η Αίγυπτος αρνήθηκε το «come back» της Λωρίδας της Γάζας, της οποίας την κυριαρχία είχε προ του πολέμου των Εξι Ημερών.

Μετά τις συμφωνίες του Οσλο, το Ισραήλ αναγνώρισε το δικαίωμα των Παλαιστινίων να αποκτήσουν ένα ανεξάρτητο κράτος στη Δυτική Οχθη και τη Λωρίδα της Γάζας. Οι δύο πλευρές όμως απέτυχαν να φθάσουν στην υπογραφή μιας βιώσιμης λύσης της σύγκρουσης. Το 2005, το Ισραήλ αποχωρεί μονομερώς από τη Λωρίδα της Γάζας, αποδεικνύοντας ότι δεν επιθυμεί τη συνέχιση της κατοχής εδαφών και ανθρώπων. Την εξουσία αναλαμβάνει η Παλαιστινιακή Αρχή, ενώ χιλιάδες Παλαιστίνιοι πανηγυρίζουν την απαλλαγή τους από την ισραηλινή κατοχή. Αντί όμως της ειρηνικής συνύπαρξης, οι παλαιστινιακές ισλαμιστικές δυνάμεις αποφασίζουν την κορύφωση του ένοπλου αγώνα κατά του Ισραήλ. Το 2006, η Χαμάς εκδιώκει τις δυνάμεις της Παλαιστινιακής Αρχής και καταλαμβάνει την εξουσία στη Γάζα.

Ο τρόμος είναι η οδυνηρότερη εκδήλωση μίσους εναντίον ενός λαού. Η ζωή ενός απλού πολίτη βρίσκεται σε συνεχή κίνδυνο την ώρα που περιμένει σε μια στάση λεωφορείου, όταν τα παιδιά του πάνε σχολείο, την ώρα που πίνει τον καφέ του σε μια καφετέρια. Περισσότεροι από 1.000 Ισραηλινοί πολίτες πέφτουν θύματα των επιθέσεων αυτοκτονίας και των ρουκετών της Χαμάς, οι οποίες εκτοξεύονται μόνο κατά αμάχων. Αντί να επενδύσουν στην παιδεία και στην υγεία του λαού τους, οι ηγέτες της Χαμάς προτίμησαν να επενδύσουν στη βιομηχανία παραγωγής εκτοξευτήρων και ρουκετών μέσα σε κτίρια διαμερισμάτων, σε σχολεία και σε νοσοκομεία προκειμένου να πολεμήσουν το Ισραήλ. Γιατί; Ποιος είναι ο στόχος τους; Να απαλλάξουν τους Παλαιστινίους από την παρουσία των Ισραηλινών στη Γάζα. Μα οι Ισραηλινοί δεν βρίσκονται πλέον στη Γάζα. Εάν η Χαμάς σταματούσε την τρομοκρατία εναντίον του Ισραήλ, όλα τα περάσματα θα παρέμεναν ανοικτά προκειμένου οι Παλαιστίνιοι να αναπτύξουν τη δική τους οικονομία, την εκπαίδευση, την υγεία. Είναι όμως φανερό ότι οι ηγέτες της Χαμάς περισσότερο θέλουν την καταστροφή του Ισραήλ παρά την ελευθερία και την ανάπτυξη των ιδίων των κατοίκων της Γάζας.

«Η αναλογικότητα των θυμάτων» είναι μία ακόμη συλλογιστική στη μηχανή προπαγάνδας της Χαμάς, στην οποία εγκλωβίζεται μάλιστα όχι μόνο ένα μεγάλο κομμάτι της κοινής γνώμης, αλλά και η παραδοσιακά υποκριτική Επιτροπή Ανθρωπίνων Δικαιωμάτων του ΟΗΕ, η οποία διατάσσει έρευνα για την εκτέλεση εγκλημάτων κατά της ανθρωπότητας από το Ισραήλ, κλείνοντας ταυτόχρονα το μάτι στη Χαμάς, στο Ιράν, στη Σαουδική Αραβία, στη Λιβύη και τη Συρία για να συνεχίσουν ανενόχλητα να εγκληματούν κατά του Ισραήλ. Σήμερα 6 εκατ. Ισραηλινοί πολίτες απειλούνται μέρα και νύχτα από τις χιλιάδες ρουκέτες της Χαμάς. Τι απαιτούν οι δήθεν υπερασπιστές των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων από το Ισραήλ; Μήπως να καταργήσει τα καταφύγια και να καταστρέψει τα αντιπυραυλικά συστήματα ασφαλείας για να προκληθούν χιλιάδες θύματα αμάχων Ισραηλινών, για να αποδειχθεί ότι οι ρουκέτες της Χαμάς και οι πύραυλοι Γκραντ δεν είναι χαρτοπόλεμος; Το Ισραήλ έχει το νόμιμο δικαίωμα να αμυνθεί, ακριβώς όπως θα έπραττε κάθε άλλο κράτος που σέβεται τους πολίτες του. Εάν η Χαμάς σεβόταν τη ζωή των ιδίων των Παλαιστινίων κατοίκων της Γάζας δεν θα τους χρησιμοποιούσε ως ανθρώπινη ασπίδα για την προστασία του οπλισμού της ούτε θα έστελνε τα παιδιά της Παλαιστίνης να σκορπίσουν τον θάνατο σε άλλα παιδιά. Εκατοντάδες αθώοι Παλαιστίνιοι πέφτουν θύματα αυτής της απάνθρωπης εκμετάλλευσης από τη Χαμάς παρά τις προσπάθειες των Ισραηλινών να αποφευχθούν θύματα μεταξύ των αμάχων. Γιατί, στόχος των Ισραηλινών δεν είναι οι άμαχοι Παλαιστίνιοι αλλά οι τρομοκράτες της Χαμάς.

Κάθε πρωτοβουλία εκεχειρίας προϋποθέτει την αποδοχή της από τις δύο πλευρές. Είναι αδύνατον το Ισραήλ να αποδέχεται την εκεχειρία και η Χαμάς να την απορρίπτει και να συνεχίζει την εκτόξευση ρουκετών. Αυτό δεν είναι εκεχειρία αλλά μονομερής κατάπαυση του πυρός, πράγμα που το Ισραήλ δεν θα κάνει εάν δεν υλοποιήσει τον στόχο του, που είναι η προστασία της ζωής των αμάχων πολιτών της χώρας. Τα θύματα αυτού του ανηλεούς πολέμου είναι πολλά και πληγώνεται η ψυχή κάθε σώφρονος ανθρώπου για την απώλεια ζωής κάθε αθώου, Ισραηλινού ή Παλαιστινίου, και είναι πλέον βέβαιο ότι η οριστική λύση του προβλήματος δεν μπορεί να επέλθει μόνο με στρατιωτικά μέσα. Οφείλουν λοιπόν τόσο ο Μπέντζαμιν Νετανιάχου όσο και ο Μαχμούντ Αμπάς να επανέλθουν στο τραπέζι των διαπραγματεύσεων και να φθάσουν σε μια ιστορική συμφωνία, που θα υπηρετεί τη βούληση της μεγάλης πλειονότητας των λαών τους: Οι Ισραηλινοί να ζουν ασφαλείς στο δικό τους δημοκρατικό εβραϊκό κράτος, οι δε Παλαιστίνιοι να αποκτήσουν το δικό τους ανεξάρτητο αραβικό παλαιστινιακό κράτος.